gandel's: washington, dc
why stop at one? how 'bout Gandel's Sub's Sandwiche's Salad Bowl's Combo's Soup's?
6/20/2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog Archive
- March (1)
- April (8)
- March (15)
- January (25)
- December (10)
- November (30)
- October (31)
- September (29)
- August (31)
- July (32)
- June (30)
- May (31)
- April (30)
- March (31)
- February (29)
- January (31)
- December (31)
- November (30)
- October (32)
- September (30)
- August (31)
- July (31)
- June (30)
- May (32)
- April (30)
- March (31)
- February (30)
- January (34)
links
- acejet170
- adcmw
- adrants
- ads of the world
- adverbatims
- advertolog
- aiga dc
- apostrophe abuse
- billboardom
- brightest young things
- crummy church signs
- death by kerning
- designers who blog
- engrish
- ernie's blog
- hoogrrl
- how design
- obsessive consumption
- passive aggressive notes
- pictures of walls
- roadside gallery
- suicide food
- typo eradication advancement league
- unnecessary quotation marks
- visual dictionary
- wooster collective
wanna share?
Old, new, digital, polaroid, cell phone...I don't care how you take your pix, just share them already. Shoot ‘em to me (pedestriantype@gmail.com) and if they’re fabulous I’ll post them AND give you credit for it. How easy is that?! Oh, and watermarks are gross.
4 comments:
why is Sandwiches possesive in your comment?
i'm poking fun at unnecessary apostrophe's
Actually, this is technically correct in some archaic forms of English abbreviation. Its logic follows the origin of standard contractions, or don't/didn't you know this?
Gandel's is fine. Combo's is not.
Post a Comment